The Other Office: Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac Review
by Ryan Smith on February 5, 2008 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Mac
Entourage
The final application in the Mac Office bundle is the Mac-exclusive Entourage email/personal information manager client. Entourage truly is a last-and-certainly-least application, as it has continued to raise user ire over the many years. For whatever reason, Microsoft has seen it fit to keep a separate email client for the Mac rather than try to port over the excellent Outlook, and this is the story of where Entourage starts.
Imagine a Classic Mac OS application ported to OS X in as quick of a time period as possible, and then to go virtually ignored since the year 2000 or so, and you have Entourage up through Entourage 2004. Entourage 2004 was bloated, it was slow, it was unstable (thanks in part to storing email in a single database that was prone to corruption), and it was ugly. Its one redeeming feature has been that it offers a sliver of support for Microsoft’s extremely popular Exchange server, and even then Entourage’s support for Exchange’s PIM functionality has been poor. Outlook for the Mac it is not.
So where does Entourage 2008 leave us? It’s an improvement, but it doesn’t completely fix what has continuously ailed the software. Since the biggest reason to use Entourage has always been its Exchange integration, Microsoft has further improved the integration between Entourage and Exchange, a process that has been continuing for several years now. Sadly it’s still not to the same level as Outlook, but it’s to the point where the lacking integration features are minor. The only data that can’t be synchronized between Entourage 2008 and Exchange are tasks & notes.
With the database problems that Entourage 2004 was notorious for, Microsoft has reportedly put a great deal of effort in to Entourage 2008’s database handling to prevent a repeat of those problems. This is something that becomes a bit hard to test since we can’t create a database problem at-will, but after spending quite some time knocking on Entourage 2008 without breaking anything, we’re willing to take Microsoft’s word on the matter.
Microsoft has also used Entourage 2008 to resolve Entourage’s search inadequacies, largely stemming from the fact that the use of a database prevented external applications from searching against its contents, and Entourage’s own search engine was subpar. Entourage now features hooks for Spotlight to use to search the database, which brings Spotlight’s far superior indexing and searching features to Entourage. It should come as no surprise that Entourage has even ditched its own search engine in favor of Spotlight when searching within Entourage.
While changes to email functionality are few (junk mail filtering is the biggest improvement here), calendaring has been heavily revised, not surprisingly acting a great deal more like iCal. Improved color-coding been implemented via color-coding categories, a previously long-desired feature. Dragging to create events has be drug over from iCal, offering a far easier way to create events than Entourage’s so-so event creation pane. Finally the calendar can be synchronized with iCal, allowing you to use iCal to do your calendaring, and still have the information eventually fed back up the chain to an Exchange server or vice versa using Exchange to do your calendaring and having it fed down to devices like the iPhone.
Like the other applications in the Office suite, Entourage has also received a general UI touchup, although not as extreme as with the other applications. There is no elements gallery or other implementation of ribbons, but the UI has been stripped of all of its Aqua and pinstripe elements for modern metal. With that said at times you can still tell Entourage was abducted from Mac OS Classic, the initial setup wizard for example is straight out of Classic.
Finally Microsoft has added a small companion utility to Entourage called My Day. My day lists all of your calendar and to-do items, and even lets you quickly add to-do items. Since it’s its own application it can be open separate from Entourage, which is the source of the oddities of My Day. My Day looks like a widget, it acts like a widget, has functionality like a widget, is the perfect size for a widget, and Microsoft even calls it widget-like, but it’s not on the Dashboard like a good widget should be. We suppose this has a couple of benefits (not requiring opening the entire dashboard to use it) but otherwise we can not come up with a good reason to not have My Day located there. It strikes us as a particularly useful widget (so much so that we would rather use it over the iCal widget) but it should be on the Dashboard with the rest of our widgets.
We’ll close our comments on Entourage with comments on speed. Entourage 2004 on a PowerPC Mac was slow, Entourage 2004 on an Intel Mac was painfully slow, Entourage 2008 is faster than both of those. Certainly we were expecting Entourage 2008 to be faster than 2004 under Rosetta, but Microsoft has gone a step further and improved its general speed. We’d still hesitate to call it fast (we figure it’s still a bit slower than Mail, iCal, etc) but no longer is it slow enough that it’s a nuisance. If you have to use Entourage, you won’t need to worry about growing old waiting on it to finish something.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
13 Comments
View All Comments
Rankin - Monday, February 11, 2008 - link
Does anyone know the performance of Word '08 and Endnote? About 6 people in my office are running Word '04 (v. 11.3.8) and Endnote X02 with OSX 10.4.11 and the response is terrible. On any document with Endnote references, the CPU jumps to 100% and pretty much stays there, with the fan screaming away, until it's minimised for >5mins or closed. This is totally unacceptable - it makes it impossible to even scroll through documents. Apple tech support just shrug (they can't say if it will be rectified with no emulation), Leopard doesn't help and we can't change from Endnote because all our PhD references are in there.Don't suppose I can convince anyone to do some tests on this to add to the review?
Gandalf90125 - Saturday, February 9, 2008 - link
"iWork is ... leaps and bounds better ... enough so that for the first time ever Microsoft has some real competition for office suites on the Mac."This is a silly comment. I don't think you are aware of Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect for Macintosh. In the early to mid-1990s, both products were excellent and were serious challengers to Microsoft's offerings. In fact, when 1-2-3 was released, Excel (version 2.2 at the time) was clearly inferior to it. I don't mean to denigrate you or your review, but I think you ought not to make such comments unless you are familiar with the history of Macintosh business applications, a history that goes back almost 25 years.
Now, I expect that I will be challenged or flamed over this on the grounds that 1-2-3 and WordPerfect never constituted an actual "Suite", but that's just semantic baloney. Word processing and electronic spreadsheets have always been the workhorses of business software applications.
strikeback03 - Thursday, February 7, 2008 - link
These figures are great, esp. implying a connection between global warming and pirates. I'd guess the pirates being outrun by cruise ships is a bigger problem for them thoughhttp://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/africa/11/05/somalia...">http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/africa/11/05/somalia...
hiromizu - Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - link
There's no mention of this important feature of remote Exchange/Outlook integration.Yawgm0th - Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - link
The article talks quite a bit about business use and how certain features (caused by lack of VBA support) are missing, mostly from Excel. This seems like a moot point, or at least the point that some of the missing features should not affect more than a few dozen -- if that many -- potential end-users of Office 2008 for Mac.What kind of business uses a Mac for accounting or a similar function based around Excel spreadsheets? I mean, one could make the argument that few business use a Mac in any function that will have use for Office, but Excel is a big stretch. No business hoping to profit would justify the cost of a Mac for use with Excel.
Ryan Smith - Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - link
One of my jobs prior to working for AnandTech was IT at a company using Macs near-exclusively (as exclusive as they could be, anyhow). You would be terrified what these people did with Excel spreadsheets and VBA, there were certainly better ways to do it but it was quite literally a matter of the whole thing having built out of Excel over the years.And this company isn't alone.
There will be plenty of Excel-addicted accountants reeling from the loss of VBA, for this you can take my word.
Pirks - Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - link
doh, no biggie - they can just replace expensive macs with cheap office dell pcs and get all their loved vba back in the business, while saving money on expensive apple hardware at the same timeOmega215D - Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - link
Any chance of this office version being updated to be more like Office 2007 on Windows? I just bought the Office 2008 Home and Student and also have a Office 2007 but couldn't get an OEM of Windows Vista without having a processor, RAM or motherboard included in the purchase. So no BootCamp for now.slashbinslashbash - Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - link
I really doubt it. I mean, look how long it took for MS to update Office for Mac to Universal. Also, MS tends to release the Mac version a year after the PC version (Mac Office 98, 2001, 2004, 2008 vs. Windows Office 97, 2000, 2003, 2007) so I doubt we'll see any new Office releases for Mac for another 3-4 years, and there's no way they'll make major updates available between releases. In the past the only updates have been due to security and stability issues, and also to add compatibility with the new .docx/.xlsx/.pptx file types. In other words, nothing major.Personally, I'm just happy that there's finally a Universal version available, and they made the cheaper "Home and Student" version. The UI updates are handy, but hardly impressive IMO.
halfeatenfish - Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - link
"The other new layout in Word is the Notebook Layout, which turns Word in to a notebook. It’s an interesting concept in theory, and if we had a tablet Mac perhaps we could put it to use, but as it stands right now we’re not sure why Microsoft added it. It’s not a page layout feature, and we can’t find much use for it on its own."Notebook layout first appeared in Word 2004. It's actually very handy for doing outlines. Think of it like a stripped down and basic OmniOutliner...