Intel proposed the original PCI 1.0 specification back in 1991. The PCI Special
Interest Group (which took over development of PCI), produced revision 2.0 in
May 1993.
Its rival at the time was the VESA Local Bus (VL-bus or VLB). Introduced by the
Video Electronics Standards Association, VL-bus was a 32-bit bus that involved a
third and forth connector appended to the end of a regular ISA slot. It ran at a
nominal speed of 33MHz and offered significant performance over ISA.
One of the main features that provided such great performance was, ironically,
one of the main factors in VLB's downfall. It was essentially a direct extension
of the 486 processor/memory bus, running at the same speed as the processor,
hence the name "local bus". This direct extension meant that connecting too many
devices risked interfering with the processor itself, particularly if the
signals went through a slot. VESA recommended that only two slots be used at
clock frequencies up to 33MHz, or three if they were electrically buffered from
the bus. At higher frequencies no more than two devices should be connected, and
at 50MHz or above they should both be built into the motherboard.
Because the VL-bus ran synchronously with the processor, increasing processor
frequencies caused real problems for VL-bus peripherals. The faster the
peripherals are required to run, the more expensive they are, due to the
difficulties associated with manufacturing high-speed components. Very few VL-bus
components were built to handle speeds in excess of 40MHz.
PCI had some compelling advantages over VL-bus. It was designed as a mezzanine bus: PCI
was a separate bus isolated from CPU, but still had access to main memory.
It had the ability to run asynchronously from the processor, with the nominal
speeds of 25MHz, 30MHz and 33MHz. As processor speeds increased, the PCI bus
speed could remain constant, as it ran at an adjustable fraction of the front
side bus. The maximum number of slots and/or peripherals allowed by PCI, 5 or
more, doubled what the VL-bus could handle, without any restrictions set by bus
speed, buffering or other electrical considerations.
Other "smart" features promoted ease of use. Plug and Play allowed automatic
configuration of peripherals without the need to set IRQ jumpers, DMA and IO
addresses. It allowed IRQs to be shared, as well as having its own interrupt
system (hidden away as #A, #B, #C and #D).
Finally, PCI bus mastering allows devices on the PCI bus to take control of the
bus and perform transfers directly without CPU arbitration. This lowers latency
and processor usage.
Its introduction alongside the Pentium processor, along with its clear benefits
over rival buses at the time, helped PCI emerge from the bus wars as the
dominant standard in 1994. Since then, just about all peripheral devices, from
hard disk controllers, sound cards, to NICs and video cards, have been PCI
based.
3 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Saturday, September 20, 2003 - link
The demo board is a BTX - ATX's successor: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1876&p...Anonymous User - Thursday, September 18, 2003 - link
First, for AGP, the official document about PCI-Express states that it can coexist with AGP. You must know that the PCI Express will only replace the PCI standard, so we can presume that the first board shipping with PCI Express will also ship with AGP.The PCI Express should not require any changes on power supplies, since it can go to lower voltages. I haven't read any technical spec, but it seems to be using some voltage-selection mechanism very similar to what is being used in USB devices (which did not require any power-supply mods).
Finally, for the form factor... well, I admit that I dunno. Form what I have read, no form factor mod should be necessary, but the demo board confuses me!
CYA!
Anonymous User - Thursday, September 18, 2003 - link
the transition from PCI to PCI Express won't happen overnight. ISA slots had stuck around for nearly 10 years before they were finally gone, so don't assume that your PCI peripherals are obsolete just yet.Thats very nice. But how about my brand new fancy AGP graphics card? I assume that purchasing a PCI-express motherboard also forces me to buy a new videocard.
Also when looking at the Intel layout demoboard I assume that there will also be a change in form factors and possibly also in power supplies. This means that all current cases would be obsolete then...
I realy enjoy the things that are going to happen in 2004 to the PC marked though! It's a real revolution again.